I can agree with you. I want to show the definition of racism here for a second-
"rac·ism
/ˈrāˌsizəm/
noun
noun: racism
the belief that different races possess distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities, especially so as to distinguish them as inferior or superior to one another."
That's the legitimate Oxford definition of the word. In other words, thinking a specific color of people to be any specific thing, especially to be worse or better than another or all other races. So according to the real definition here, wouldn't that mean that believing in white privilege is the exact definition? Believing in white privilege means that you believe that white people possess certain privileges, or abilities, that other races do not, making them appear superior. Am I wrong? That literally corresponds directly to the definition. White privilege doesn't exist, it doesn't. It's America, we've all got the same rights, read the constitution. It never says white people have anything. No law in America has anything to do with race except anti-discrimination laws. And guess what? Anti-discrimination laws aren't in favor of the straight white male. If they are in favor of anyone, it would be the opposite. So there are no actual laws that are different for different people except maybe anti-discriminatory laws. Alright? So if racism and yadda yadda aren't physical law issues, they are psychological issues. Psychological issues like this are typically one set of people who are the victim (we'll say black people just because they are the main representation of the victim in racism), and one set of people who are the offenders (since white people are in that situation, we'll say white people). The victim demands revenge for their treatment and they build up hatred for the offender unless the offender pays. The offender, in this case, wouldn't have necessarily done anything wrong except genetically have a specific skin color, white. So the offender would feel wrongly accused since all they would have done is be born and live. So the offender would get defensive and build up hatred for the victim. Since in this case, the offender would be accused of hating and not liking the victim for no reason, this just builds up non-stop hatred. Some people in the offender spot would pull a witch trial confession, which is to say, they would falsely confess to what they are accused of. This could be because of the tension and pressure, or just to try and settle the argument even if it's wrong. Another reason I call it a witch trial confession is because in the witch trials if you confessed one time and were put on trial again, they had more "evidence" against you since you had been a "witch" before. And so, the victim uses the witch trial confessions as more evidence against the offender. The offender will turn on itself because some are under false confession and won't admit it, and others are still pleading innocent to it. Some of the victim may also turn on itself because a few of them will be able to see what's happening and they will confess to not having actually been a part of it. The offender will use the victim confessions as leverage for the victim. So you have the victim and offender, both caught in their own loops, and some of the ones from each will switch over to the other side. Neither side will win with logic. It's impossible to win with that kind of logic because it's a psychological loop that doesn't end unless both sides want to take in new information, which they often don't. So, it's a draw, right? Nope. Unfortunately, in situations like that, no one will forgive the other because of all of the hatred that breeds from the two. The victim won't forgive the offender, the offender won't forgive the victim, they'll hate each other so much that they will resort to what all unkept hatred turns into, physical fighting, or in larger cases with more people, war. In which the winner will not matter. If the offender wins, the loop doesn't change, the victim still feels like the victim, they still blame the offender, the loop will continue after a while. If the victim wins, they will have the revenge they want, but the offender's hatred breeds so much worse, and the roles either switch or the loop continues. Of course, there is a third role, which includes all other races, but they would just pick sides. It's a like self-fulfilling prophecy. There are only two ways to break a self-fulfilling prophecy. 1. You make a bigger self-fulfilling prophecy around it. I doubt that would happen here. Or 2. Someone outside of the prophecy intervenes. In this case, it's the people who can recognize the victim and offender's states of mind and try to stop it.
